Gun Nuts

Gun nuts,

Please, before you try to sell me on this part of the 2nd Amendment, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Please read the first part of the amendment first where they tell you why they gave you this right, "A WELL REGULATED Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State". They didn't say, Due to the small size of your penis and failings in life, In order for you to shoot up defenseless school children, or Because you never learned to fight and don't know how do deal with an ass whipping, or Because you are a crazy paranoid schizophrenic, or because when you personally think it's time to overthrow the Government because it's being led by a black guy, no, it says,"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State". Period, that's why that right was given...It's there, in ink.


I'm not saying that they ONLY meant for guns to be in the hands of militia men since we had relatively no standing army at the time but there are other contexts that gun nuts don't take into account.


A.   This is a 60" long Musket common to the era in which the 2nd Amendment was written:

B. This is the led balls it could fire about 100 yards every 90 seconds:

No reasonable person at the time thought that the 2nd Amendment applied to private citizens owning cannons, frigates or any other strictly military weapons.


A. This is a 40" long AR-10 which gun nuts now claim is referred to in the catch all phrase as "arms":

 B. These are some of the 60 rounds per minute (military version can fire 800 RPM) it can fire  at a range of about 700 yards:

Do you see how these are different and should be treated as such?? Not to mention the fact that the US Federal Government could barely staff a standing army and relied on militias as a first response to an invasion from one of the many enemies who had the capabilities of executing such a task.



And why is it that the 2nd Amendment is seemingly the only one that comes with no limits?? And speaking of limits, also there in ink in plain English, it says this right must be "WELL REGULATED".

The 2nd Amendment clearly states, here's your right, here's why and here is how it should be managed, yet gun nuts have gun blinders on that only allows them to see this part: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This would be like an Anarchist defending anarchy with the first Amendment by stating, "Congress shall make no law" and stopping there. It's moronic.


And then there is this:

Congress shall make NO law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.

It clearly says in the first Amendment, "NO LAW restricting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" yet, Mormons aren't allowed to practice Polygamy, Rastafarians aren't allowed to smoke weed, churches can't officially endorse political candidates and now, even companies aren't allowed to force their religious beliefs upon their employees. We have the freedom of Speech yet I can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater (unless their is a nut with an AR-10 shooting at everyone) and the press cannot slander someone even though the constitution seemingly gives them the right to do. And don't even get me started about the 5th Amendment and how that's been interpreted and limited in it's rights.

Why isn't the NRA and the gun nuts out there fighting for Polygamy if they are such strict constitutionalists??

And before you start saying Nugent was right and Obama's plan was to come for your guns and bunkers and white women from the get go, just remember that from a legislative stance, Obama never once talked about gun control, not after Tucson, not after Aurora. But Bush W clearly stated that he would have renewed and signed the assault rifle ban when it expired in  2004 and that Obama's stance on gun control are actually more lax than Reagan's, who supported assault rifle bans and once said,

"I do not believe in taking away the right of the citizen for sporting, for hunting and so forth, or for home defense. But I do believe that an AK-47, a machine gun, is not a sporting weapon or needed for defense of a home.'' -  Ronald Reagan, 1989

And you have to love the irony in this non-Onion headline:

5 People Shot at 3 Different Gun Shows on Gun Appreciation Day

Remember, it's the NRA's stance that guns don't shoot and kill people, that people at gun shows are responsible and that no one has ever been shot at a gun show and that the more guns you have the safer you will be which is obvious when looking at places like the US, Iraq, Pakistan, Congo, Russia, etc...Or where gun ownership in the area of this country is most common and it also happens to be the area of the country with the highest crime and murder rates.

You can be a gun owner, that's fine, I own a gun, but if you believe the bullshit from the NRA, you are an idiot who is easily manipulated.

We Win! What it doesn't mean

For all the Ted Nugents, Trumps, Tebows and other morons out there erroneously quoting our founding fathers and suggesting that somehow the Democrats will take an early lead until the Republicans get home from work or how Obama only won because he was going to take away from those who work and give it to people who won't work need to realize this: First off,  in the case of Tim Tebow, you have to love the irony of a guy who sits around on a bench most of the day, not doing anything and collecting a pay check for doing nothing making a statement like that. Second, the reason Obama won Ohio and in counties like Perry Indiana with an automotive foundry is not because he was going to reward them for not having a job but because he SAVED their jobs. That's right, Obama won Ohio, Michigan and all the counties dependent on the auto industry because he vowed to make sure those people KEPT working...Not because they could benefit from not working.

Lastly, the only guy in this election who both in college and in his early life and for the last several years benefits from free money for not working, was Mitt Romney. Obama works and always has worked for his income.

The next time some mouth breathing Wal-Mart shopper tries to play that card, stuff a bag of Chick-Fil-A down their throats.

More Lies, Next thing you know, they will start calling the President a Kenyan born Muslim, Socialist...Oh, wait...

http://www.examiner.com/article/chrysler-s-ceo-sergio-marchionne-calls-romney-out-for-jeep-to-china-lies

This is Why Romney is as Dangerous as Palin

We can't risk it! Vote Obama!

Romney Voter

Romney's hot but isn't a Christian. He is a candidatual selection. She is an aspiring antepanure...girl. Apparently Ryan built a business. Obama has put an end to Catholicism...Single-handedly. The Pope is dead, all the nuns have been raped and converted to Islam....By Reverend Wright.



This is the reason people like Bush and Romney (and almost Palin) get elected.

If you agree with this girl, please remember to vote on Thursday, November  8th.

Will the Real Mitt Romney Please Stand Up?

Romney's Entitlement Statement

There are 2% of the people who will vote for Romney no matter what. All right, there are 2% who are with him, who are dependent on government and their inheritances who believe they are victims of class warfare, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe they are entitled to your money, social security, government subsidies, tax payer funded bailouts, tax breaks, tax loopholes, no-bid government contracts and who get to write the very financial laws which govern them, you name it. That’s an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for Romney no matter what.

It’s the Presidents job not to worry about those people. He will never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives. What the President has to do is convince the other 98% of people who may be independent, that are thoughtful, who look at voting one way or the other depending upon, in some cases, emotion, whether or not they like the black guy or not.

Traditional Biblical Marriage

Who Can Create Jobs?

"Since 1961 … our private economy has produced 66 million private-sector jobs. So what's the jobs score? Republicans 24 million, Democrats 42 (million)."

Want to Blame Obama for the Economy?

Ok, let's do that:

A. On Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 13157, up 49% from 8776 at the end of 08 and up 23% from 2001 when Bush took office

B. Housing start permits were at 549,000 in December of 08, in July they were at 812,000, a 47% INCREASE and rising!

C. Since the first Obama budget went into effect, the national debt has increased 32%, under Bush it increased 110%, under Reagan, 180%. If people like Romney paid what I pay in taxes, this wouldn't be such a problem.

D. In June, corporate profits hit an all time high but THEY were paying less in wages...Wages are not controlled by Obama.

E. At the same point in the Bush Presidency, private sector job growth was DOWN 1.7%, under Obama it is UP 4% from Feb 2010.

F. At the same point in their Presidency, public sector job growth increased 3.7% but under Obama it had DECREASED 2.7%! Obama's job growth has come from the private sector, Bush's job growth came from the public sector. I mean, someone had to listen to your phone calls without a warrant.

G. The Obama economy has seen 29 straight months of of job growth with over 4 million jobs added in that time frame.

H. Home Prices have risen for 5 straight months!

The Republicans have one number, unemployment, that's it. And if all these Republican Governors weren't busy firing teachers, cops, social workers, firemen and other state workers (AKA union thugs), that number would be much lower. If Obama had the same amount of public job growth, the unemployment numbers would be well under 8%. It's your side who hates the teachers and state and local government workers so you are getting what you asked for. You can't blame those jobs on Obama.





Numbers don't lie, Republicans do!

Chick Falatio

Jesus on divorce:
 Matthew19:6 "So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate."

Matthew 5:32 But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, makes her the victim of adultery, and anyone who marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

 Mark 10:11 So He said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her. 12 "And if a woman divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery."

 Luke 16:18 "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced from her husband commits adultery.  

Jesus on gay marriage:











 That about wraps that up. But wait, Mike Huckabee, who called for the Chick Falatio appreciation day is the former Governor of Arkansas, which in 2009, had the highest divorce rate in the country. Why focus on just one of the things he thinks the Bible condemns?? Why isn't he protesting Arkansas for their loose morals on divorce??

 Look, if you hate gays, just come out and say it. If you just think gay marriage makes your marriage not valid or whatever, then fine. But what you can't do is say you are against it because of the Bible or what Jesus said. And if you do, then you have to equally protest Chick Falatio because it makes people fat and gluttony is also a sin as is serving pork which is what they do in their breakfast sandwiches which the Old Testament is very clear about being unclean or the fact that Chick Falatio is open on the Sabbath, which in the Bible, is punishable by death. And then of course if you are divorced, you have NO credibility when talking about the holiness or sanctity of marriage. The divorce rate in Arkansas is 13.15 and just 9.4 for the rest of the country.

Here is the drive through at an Arkansas Chick Falatio:

How many divorcees do you think are in that line? How many of them are gluttoness fat bodies? How many are getting bacon on their sandwich? All hypocrites!

Obama Does Not Set Oil Prices

Rich oil companies subsidized by the federal government who want to influence elections by raising and lowering prices do.





http://www.barackobama.com/energy-info?source=socnet_20120229_BO_FB&utm_medium=fb&utm_source=bo_fb&utm_campaign=20120229_bo_fb_energy_chart

Stop Listening to Republican Fear Mongering...They Are Idiots

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

Red State=Welfare State, Blue State=Backbone of America

US Entitlement Map

Hey urban, educated blue states! Ever wonder where all your money goes?? Republicans would have you believe that it goes to fat black welfare Mom's in the projects of Chicago who had too many kids they couldn't afford in order to rev Chicago's "machine" style politics and get black, Muslim, Kenyans elected President. Well, it doesn't. It goes towards oil and mining and agriculture companies and to the the rest of the people in the bible belt and Appalachia...And also to some very poor Native American areas. And building roads, sewers and providing other services on a road with 8 people on it ( you know, the real America that isn't elitists who go to college, live in high rises and take subways to work) costs a lot more than providing these services on a road with 800 people like you have in larger population areas...AKA, the fake America that doesn't cling to their guns and bibles when screaming at gay people.

Everyone has heard the term "Welfare States" which are states like IN, SC, AL, MS, KY, AR, AK, etc. who all get more in federal funding than they pay in federal taxes unlike CA, IL, NY, NJ, MA, CT, WA etc. who pay more into the system than they get out so they can fund faith based programs for fat kids with Diabetes in places like MS, AL and AR where they pay much lower tax rates than we do in the more urban blue states. For instance, for every dollar paid in federal taxes, MS gets back $1.84, AK $1.82, WV $1.74, AL $1.61 etc. Where as NJ only gets $.62 back in federal spending, CT $.64, IL $.77, MA $.79 and CA and NY $.81.

Note Sarah Palin's (Ms. Small Government) home of Alaska!

That's all, I just wanted you to know that you are being lied to!

And You Thought Catholics and Muslims Were Crazy...

From CNN:
Mormons apologize for posthumous baptisms of Weisenthal's Parents.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has apologized for "a serious breach of protocol" in which the parents of the late Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal were posthumously baptized as Mormons.

The church also acknowledged that three relatives of Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel were entered into the genealogy database, though not referred for baptism.

Asher Wiesenthal and Rosa Rapp were baptised in proxy ceremonies in temples in Utah and Arizona, according to the database records discovered by researcher Helen Radkey in Salt Lake City.

The Wiesenthal baptisms violated a 1995 pact in which the church agreed to stop baptizing Jewish Holocaust victims.

"We sincerely regret that the actions of an individual member of the church led to the inappropriate submission of these names," said church spokesman Michael Purdy.

"These submissions were clearly against the policy of the church. We consider this a serious breach of our protocol and we have suspended indefinitely this person's ability to access our genealogy records."

Mormons believe that they may be baptized by proxy for deceased ancestors who never had that opportunity.

Church members, however, are supposed to request such baptisms only for their own relatives, Purdy said.

The agreement over Holocaust victims came about after it was discovered that hundreds and thousands of names had been entered into Mormon records.

Jewish leaders said it was sacrilegious for Mormons to suggest Jews on their own were not worthy enough to receive God's eternal blessing. Radkey, who has been tracking Mormon genealogy records for a while for people who ought not to be there, said she inadvertently stumbled upon the Wiesenthal name a few weeks ago. Among others people she discovered had been baptized by proxy is President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center denounced the baptisms.

Wiesenthal's father died in combat in World War I. His mother perished at the Belzec concentration camp in 1942. Holocaust survivor Simon Wiesenthal died in 2005 after spending years hunting down Nazis.

"We are outraged that such insensitive actions continue in the Mormon Temples," said Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, who participated in many of the high-level meetings between Jews and Mormon officials.

"Such actions make a mockery of the many meetings with the top leadership of the Mormon Church dating back to 1995 that focused on the unwanted and unwarranted posthumous baptisms of Jewish Victims of the Nazi Holocaust," he said in a written statement.

He expressed gratitude to Radkey for "exposing the latest outrage."

Radkey also found the names of relatives of Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor, author and Nobel Peace Prize laureate.

"In this case, the Wiesel family names were not submitted for baptisms but simply entered into a genealogical database," Purdy said. "Our system would have rejected those names had they been submitted."

Purdy said it was "distressing" that church members had violated policy and regretted that "an offering based on love and respect becomes a source of contention."

Radkey said the church makes such breaches possible because any member can submit a name not connected to their own family.

"There are way too many entries slipping through the cracks, including Jewish Holocaust victims," she said. "It's (the Mormons') belief to save the dead that is causing the problem."

Wiesel, meanwhile, told the Huffington Post that Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who is Mormon, should speak to his own church and tell them to stop the practice of proxy baptisms on Jews.

Dan Gilgoff - CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor

The Romney family even posthumously baptized Ann Romney's atheist Father.

I mean, wow! How fucking crazy can you get?

Aside from the mere craziness of this and the belief that you can "baptize" someone after they die and they can choose accept it when they get to heaven (and that there is a heaven), let's examine the word baptize...I understand Catholics have a different interpretation of what baptize means and apparently Mormons are just making it up as they go but I was always under the impression that it meant you had to take an actual person (living presumably) and dunk them under water to spiritually cleanse them. And if spirits leave the body upon dying...How were the Mormons able to retrieve those spirits/souls??

And my question to any Mormon would be, HOW DO YOU KNOW?? Who was it that came up with this insane idea and why would you believe such nonsense?? And if you can baptize the dead, can I unbaptize dead Mormons? Or even unbaptize the dead people you baptized...And if you say "no"...Well, how do you know God didn't tell me I could in some gold tablets he gave me at the beach the other day??

And the other side of this is, WHO GIVES A SHIT!! Why would anyone care that Mormons and their phony religion are somehow changing the destiny of dead Jews or whomever...Jews don't believe this nonsense so why would they care any more than if a Wiccan somewhere was cursing the dead? And let's pretend it's all real; like any life long Jew is going to get to heaven and decide at the pearly gates that he is going to convert to Mormonism?? Apparently Mormons haven't met many Jews. But then again on the flip side, what if as it turns out, Mormonism IS the only way to get to heaven...Wouldn't these dead Jews (who invented this god in the first place) want to at least have that option on the table when it came down to their judgment day? I mean, why not...It's like an atheist doubling down on his death bed and accepting Christ or whatever...What harm could it do just in case?

Wow, look at me trying to make sense out of religion....I feel like a dog chasing it's tail.