Tuesday, January 18, 2005

More on the Antics of Falwell

Jerry Falwell in response to the 9/11 attacks:
"The abortionist’s have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad. I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America, I point the finger in their face and say: you helped this happen."
Yes, I can often found out in public mocking god, it's one of my favorite pass-times.

Falwell:“I listen to feminists and all these radical gals... These women just need a man in the house. That's all they need. Most of the feminists need a man to tell them what time of day it is and to lead them home. And they blew it and they're mad at all men. Feminists hate men. They're sexist. They hate men; that's their problem."

Excuse me, who did you say was sexist?

“It is the responsibility of...every evangelical Christian...to get serious about re-electing President Bush."
Keep in mind they have tax exempt status. I would say that is as close as you get to a political endorsement without actually sucking him off on camera.

“The idea that religion and politics don't mix was invented by the Devil(apparently meaning Thomas Jefferson) to keep Christians from running their own country.”

“AIDS is the wrath of a just God against homosexuals. To oppose it would be like an Israelite jumping in the Red Sea to save one of Pharoah's chariotters.”

Really, so why are most people in the world who are infected with AIDS heterosexual? He also sounds a lot like an M.O.D. song.

"I think Muhammad was a terrorist. I read enough of the history of his life written by both Muslims and - non-Muslims, (to know) that he was a -- a violent man, a man of war."
I guess I'm not really going to dispute that, but it almost makes this whole thing a big religious war doesn't it.

Falwell on the Teletubbies: "He is purple -- the gay-pride color, "and his antenna is shaped like a triangle-- the gay pride symbol." "These subtle depictions are no doubt intentional and parents are warned to be alert to these elements of the series."
You're an idiot!

"I hope I live to see the day when, as in the early days of our country, we won't have any public schools. The churches will have taken them over again and Christians will be running them. What a happy day that will be!"

Ya they're all so happy in Iran and Afghanistan.

“Is the Antichrist alive and here today?""because when he appears during theribulation period he will be a full-grown counterfeit of Christ. Of course he'll be Jewish."

So in other words, be fearful of Jews, they are going to be our downfall, wait was this Falwell or Hitler?

“And we're going to invite PETA [to "Wild Game Night"] as our special guest, P-E-T-A -- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. We want you to come, we're going to give you a top seat there, so you can sit there and suffer. This is one of my special groups, another one's the ACLU, another is the NOW – the National Order of Witches [sic]. We've got -- I've got a lot of special groups.”

Yes he calls the National Organization of Women the National Order of Witches.

Actions speak louder than words:
Jerry Falwell once paid Citizens for Honest Government to smear Clinton, making allegations of Murder and Cocaine Distribution. This is the same guy who tried to sue Hustler for making false accusations against him.

In 1994 Jerry Falwell accepted $3.5 million from Korean cult messiah Sun Myung Moon as part of a larger deal to get Liberty University, which Falwell founded, out of debt. Jerry then urged his friend President Reagan to pardon Moon's tax evasion conviction.

Jerry's Church has also donated 1.5 million dollars to Israel. For some reason he thought America's biggest recipient of aid, wasn't getting enough money from us.
Now his earlier statement about Mohammed being a terrorist makes a bit more sense doesn't it?

Thursday, January 13, 2005

The Bottom of the Evolutionary Ladder

There was a theory back in the late 1800s that tried to link criminal behavior with physical traits. This theory pretty much stated that if you didn’t look like a member of the royal family then you were probably a criminal. It was believed that the more you looked like an ape, animal or Neanderthal, the more likely you were to have a lower brain function and resort to crime, in other words if you were a low brow, then you were probably a rapist. This manifested itself somewhat in the Jack the Ripper case, a common belief was that a Jew must be responsible for this type of crime because their noses didn’t look like English noses or what ever, and that an Englishman would never commit such a crime. This theory was eventually laughed off, until I stumbled across the Chicago sex offenders website. Once I started pulling up these guys pictures I started thinking that maybe that old theory of physical attributes being linked to crime isn’t such a stretch after all.
All you have to do is take one look at these guys and realize that they were never going to become President, Mayor, CEOs, or millionaires, no, their potential has already been reached, this is it, this is the top of their game. Talk about finishing last in the human race.
And without further ado; here they are:

If you are going to the police station to get your sex offender picture taken, try not to look like an actual rapist, you wife beater wearing mullet!

"You can' t rape the willing, that's why I am a rapist."
What is he looking at anyway?


Mullet+Balding+Facial Hair=Pedophile

I think the mark on his head is from when he and his twin were separated at birth, the twin got the brains and lived, this guy...Not so much.

Neanderthal! Here it is, the proof of evolution.

Yet another link in the evolutionary chain, can you say low brow?

Hi Everybody, Harry Caray is a pedder ass!

Looks like that Willie Horton photo.

David Berkowitz's Brother

Hey Tyrone, If you don't have the self control to stand still for more than 3 seconds for a photo, how are you going to have the self control to keep your dick out of 8 year olds?

Leather Daddy! Whats that growth behind his ears? Does he have a starter mullet?

This guy just got beat by the ugly stick, plain and simple.

I wouldn't even let this guy walk my dog, for fear of what he might try to do.

I'll bet this guy has tight rolled jeans.

Did this guy actually bring his bull whip with him to the police station?

"Dude, meet me at the middle school around three, we'll pick up chicks."

"I'll suck it for a hit of Oxy Contin!"
Oops how did this last one get in here?

This guy is not on the Chicago sex offenders list but somewhere in Ohio. Here is his actual picture from the sex offenders site. He truly does take the cake:
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Wednesday, January 12, 2005

Gay Sex

I am a normal straight agnostic male. I think about gay sex probably 2 to 3 times a month, and that's only when I see two hot lesbians walking down the street holding hands, or when I watch some conservative talk show, which brings me to my point.
Why do Conservatives obsess over gay sex so much? Yes, the thought of two guys jackhammering each other is disgusting, so here's an idea, QUIT THINKING ABOUT IT!
You know what else is disgusting, two fat, toothless, hairy, redneck, heterosexual couples having sex in a hot trailer, so you know what I do about it? Nothing, and I try not to think about it. As long as its happening at the McDonalds drive thru outside of Jackson, MS It doesn't affect me.
I'll bet Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson think about gay sex more than all the Village People and the broadway musical cast of Cats, put together.

..."Oh lordy, I can just imaginge what those two guys are going to do to each other when they get home"..."Oh Yes, I can picture it now.".."Better get the law books out"
"I guess I'll call my friend Reverend Moon now and bribe him for some more money
"..."Where's Pat when you need him?" ..."Those gays are going to hell for this"

Lets Talk About Dogs For A Change of Pace

Did you know that Cockerspaniels, Pomeranians, Akitas, Weimaraners, Poodles, German Sheppards, Sheepdogs, Schnauzers and Collies are more likely to bite you than a Pit-Bull. The American Canine Temperament Testing Association is an organization that titles dogs for passing its temperament test. The test consists of putting the dog into a series of unexpected situations, some involving strangers. The dog fails the test if it shows any signs of unprovoked aggression or panic around people. Of all dogs that take the test, 77 percent on average pass. But among pit bulls who take the test, 83 percent on average pass, the same--one of the highest passing rates of all breeds. Golden Retrievers also have an 83 percent pass rating. And of all the dog attacks in the US a year only 1.9 Percent involve Pit-Bulls. From 1965-2001, 36 different breeds were responsible for human fatalities in the US, 52 world wide.
If you ban Pit-Bulls, or Bull breeds, the assholes who use these dogs for fighting and gang activity will just start using Rottweilers, who are twice the size of a pitbull, more territorial and more likely to attack a human. If you ban Rottweilers then these same people will start using German Sheppards, Akitas, Chows or whatever else they can find. The dogs are not the problem, the people are, they are the ones who should be banned and put to sleep!

Do you even know what a Pit-Bull looks like? Take the test.

  • Find the Pit Bull

  • The Pitbull Problem
  • "The disposition of noble dogs is to be gentle with people they know and the opposite with those they don’t know" - Plato

    Friday, January 07, 2005

    More Examples of how Religion Warps You

    Here’s how religion warps you! Especially backwards ass religions who haven’t even made it into the 19th century yet. Of which there are very few.

    Excerpt from editorial by:
    Diana West
    Washington Times

    From worlds away — maybe another planet — "explanations" for the tsunami catastrophe begin. On Palestinian Authority TV, according to MEMRI, Sheik Ibrahim Mudeiris asked Allah in a Friday sermon to have mercy on "all the Muslims who died" in the tsunami. Which means everyone else is on his own. Next, the sheik railed against the disaster's cause, which was neither earth, skies nor anything divine in between. It seems it all had to do with "the oppression and corruption caused by America and the Jews" — naturally. General corruption in Bangkok worked its way into the homily as well, but mainly as the sordid site of "Zionist and American investments." The question for his flock was: "Do you want the sea to lower its waves in the face of this corruption that it sees with its own eyes? No," he replied, "the zero hour has come." Too bad his keepers haven't.

    Saudi cleric Muhammad Al-Munajjid's take, as broadcast on state-controlled Saudi television (also reported by MEMRI), was somewhat more religious. Or rather more anti-religious, make that anti-Christian. "The problem is that the [Christian] holidays are accompanied by forbidden things: by immorality, abomination, adultery, alcohol, drunken dancing, and ... and revelry," he said, displaying a less-than-Dickensian expansiveness of spirit. "At the height of immorality, Allah took vengeance on these criminals ... Allah struck them with an earthquake. He finished off the Richter Scale," he added. "All nine levels gone." No mention of the tens of thousands of non-Christians "gone" alongside said "criminals" — and, of course, no mention of the vast amounts of "criminal" (and even, yegods, Jewish) aid pouring into the region, most expeditiously via the United States military, in amounts that dwarf the contributions of the Muslim world.

    Then there's the Website Jihad Unspun. In a feat of contorted thinking not even The New York Times editorial page would attempt, it connects the killer from the sea to Thailand's support for U.S. foreign policy — that is, for "the Christian Crusaders" at "the altar of capitalism." No word on why Allah kept other U.S. allies tsunami-free, not to mention Washington, D.C. and Tel Aviv.


    Thursday, January 06, 2005

    The Moral Majority

    I told you that I would try to breakdown each group thats on my bomb throwers list. Well after completing the one on the FRC I wanted to do something on The Moral Majority, which is Jerry Falwells group. Well I didn't have to look far, I went to their website when they were having a members only day and was shocked to see a breakdown of their platforms. I really dont think I was supposed to see this.
    Well here they are, straight from their web-site:

    Platform # 1 The Moral Majority Coalition will conduct an intensive four-year "Voter Registration Campaign" through America's non-catholic and conservative churches, para-military groups, pro-life freedom fighters and pro-white family organizations.

    Platform #2 The Moral Majority Coalition will conduct well organized "Get-Out-Rig-The-Vote Campaigns" in 2006 and 2008.

    Platform #3 The Moral Majority Coalition will engage in the massive recruitment, re-education and mobilization of the Gestapo through television, radio, direct mail (U.S.P.S. and Internet) and public rallies throughout the Reich.

    Platform #4 The Moral Majority Coalition will encourage the promotion of continuous private, federal and corporate sponsorship for America's moral resistance based on 2 Chronicles 7:14.

    Crazy huh?

    Wednesday, January 05, 2005

    Stop Peeing in the Gene Pool

    From CNN: Wednesday, January 5, 2005 Posted: 7:44 AM EST (1244 GMT)
    ROCHESTER, New York (AP) -- A Family Court judge who last year stirred debate about parental responsibilities ordered a second drug-addicted woman to have no more children until she proves she can look after the seven she already has.

    I know what you are thinking; finally, someone is putting the responsibility of child bearing on parents and not the government, and they are going to force contraception, abort, sterilize or shoot this loser who has had 3 of her 7 babies born addicted to cocaine. No, unfortunately she hasn’t been taken out of the gene pool yet, but will be thrown in jail for contempt if she gets pregnant again. So, it’s a start, and you can thank Judge Marilyn O'Connor of NY for this spark of rationalism.

    But, of course, the NY Civil Liberties Union is piping in saying the judge has no right to do such a thing because it "tramples on a fundamental right -- the right to procreate." and "Ordering a woman under threat of jail not to have any more babies ... puts the court squarely in the bedroom. And that's no place for the government."

    That’s funny but isn’t that what got Dubya elected, putting the court in the bedroom? Why is it ok to put laws into the bedroom in one place and not the other? Having a child that you can’t take care of is hardly a personal, private issue or a fundamental right. I’ve put more thought into which aspirin to put in my body than this lady puts in deciding which dick to put into hers. Where in the constitution does it say everyone in America has the right to have 7 babies with 7 different fathers (which she did) and that the tax payers have to pay for all of them, especially when they end up in foster homes. Hmmm... Looking, looking… nope, nowhere!
    In fact, I think the more kids you have, the less welfare and the fewer food stamps you get. Also, if you live in public housing and have a 2 bedroom with 2 kids, and have another baby, they should force you to move you to a one bedroom. Maybe that will teach people that if you can’t afford or take care of the first baby, then maybe it’s not a good idea to have another one.

    It’s basically like me going out and buying a Porsche and when I figure out I can’t afford it, I’ll go out and buy another one, and make you pay for both of them, while I go out and shoot dope.
    God Damnit, I have a fundamental right to own a Porsche! That’s what I call “the pursuit of happiness.”

    Man, I don’t know why I haven’t run for office yet.

    Monday, January 03, 2005

    www.frc.org Family Research Council explained

    The “Family” Research Council claims to have been defending family, faith and freedom for over 20 years and also claims to be one of the most influential social policy establishments.

    But for some reason, I get the feeling they really have no interest in defending my freedoms, my family, or my faith because, basically, my family, faith and vision of freedom doesn’t mirror theirs. If fact, they are responsible for restricting more freedoms than defending them. They are great at defending their faith, Christianity, and probably like the idea of being a nice white affluent Christian family with 2.5 kids that are taught to demonize other kids who don’t believe the way they do.

    So here are the FRCs core principals:

    1.God exists and is sovereign over all creation. He created human beings in His image. Human life is, therefore, sacred and the right to life is the most fundamental of political rights. No, there is no god and I have more evidence supporting my claim than you do of yours.
    2.Life and love are inextricably linked and find their natural expression in the institutions of marriage and the family. So what you are saying is that there is no love without marriage and family? How many “in love” happily married couples do you know, last I checked 50% of all marriages end in divorce.
    3.Government has a duty to promote and protect marriage and family in law and public policy. No one wants to make laws saying you can’t get married, except you! Marriage and family don’t need protection because no one is attacking them, you are paranoid. The only thing that threatens marriage is divorce.
    4.The American system of law and justice was founded on the Judeo-Christian ethic. Which ethic was that? Thou shall not kill? That and don’t steal are the only 2 of the 10 commandments that made it into our law books. There’s a lot more to our laws than 2 commandments.
    5.American democracy depends upon a vibrant civil society composed of families, churches, schools, and voluntary association. And separation from church and state and the freedom from religion, and freedom of speech and expression, the freedom to watch the movies you want to watch, the freedom to listen to the music you want to listen to, the freedom to develop your own sense of morals that are logical and come from the heart, not from the pages of some old book that has been written and rewritten for the last 2000 years.

    So that’s their stance and the logic they use to formulate their OPINIONS and my response to them.

    Here are some quotes from their web-site (http://www.frc.org):

    This is an important provision that will increase tenfold fines for indecent behavior on public airwaves - something desperately needed in this day of Janet Jacksons and Howard Sterns. This language MUST STAY within the bill, or the FCC will lose a powerful weapon in this fight.Additionally, the "hate crime" legislation included in the Defense Authorization Bill MUST BE STRIPPED. If allowed to pass, this provision could be used to stifle free speech by individuals and churches, as has happened in Canada and on college campuses. Mere thought will be punished and open debate will be eroded on the issues important to us all.
    It’s almost like they are saying we don’t want people to say what they think but we should be allowed to say we want. Hitler had that same exact idea.

    On why condoms don’t work and abstinence does:

    The United States is in the midst of a sexually transmitted disease (STD) epidemic. We have the highest STD rate in the developed world.
    We also have the highest murder rate in the western world, why don’t you address that since you are so concerned with life, hypocrites!

    On Feminism and the suburbs:

    In 1960, 75 percent of all American households were "married couple households" and average household size was 3.4 persons. By 2000, though, married couples comprised only about 50 percent of households and average household size had fallen to 2.5. All the growth was in the never-married, divorced, and "childless cohabitating" categories. Indeed, if the suburban family model of 1960 could be magically imposed on the American populace of 2003, the U.S. would actually need 28 million fewer dwelling units than it now has. Put another way, marriage and larger families actually prove to be more environmentally friendly than singles and childless couples. Why? Larger families--on a per capita basis--use less land, building materials, fuel, food, and supplies; they are more efficient.
    No, you morons! If all these people that currently don’t have 1.4 children had them, we would be a nation of 350 million instead of 250 million. It’s good that we don’t all get married at 19, and are able to live a productive life for ourselves. Otherwise, we could all end up uneducated with a bunch of angry, suburban brats who cry about everything only to end up shooting up their classmates and blowing up their schools, leaving their 2 kids behind because you thought condoms were a bad idea, because Jesus supposedly said so! If my girlfriend and I, who aren’t taking any resources away from society, such as welfare and school tax money, and live together without children, in a small condo that consists of 26 units in the same amount of space as your one house with a 2 car garage, then how are we less efficient than you and all the suburban NASCAR dads who have 4 kids that contributes to burdening the school systems and may or may not be sucking up other societal resources such as puplic aid? Not to mention all the resources used in driving all these brats around to soccer practice and doctors appointments. What not having kids means for us, a “childless cohabitating” FAMILY , is extra money to buy things such as new hybrid cars (most likely made in the U.S. and, therefore, contributing to society) as opposed to you having to buy cheap baby toys and strollers from Wal-Mart that were made by slave labor in China?

    The latter just shows you how retarded and uneducated they really are, or how brainwashed they would like the rest of us to be. Think of the Taliban or a place like Afghanistan where you don’t learn history, math, or anything about the humanities and instead all you learn is scripture and what someone else thinks your particular “god” thought about a particular issue that didn’t even exist at the time when that part of your “Bible” was written.