Wednesday, October 05, 2005

Back Home Again in Shitiana

Apparently Indiana is, as most other states, trying to cope with an escalating crisis of lesbian hoards that spawn gay love children, who when later abandoned, turn into a class of Godless homosexual Democrats. In response, Indiana Republican State Senator Patricia Miller is proposing new legislation which will dictate who will and will not be permitted to have children through means of assisted reproduction. In short, this new code they want to pass into law will only allow “qualified” married couples to reproduce through other means when they are unable to conceive naturally.

The bottom line here is that they want to prevent lesbians, widows, non-Christians, fat ugly single women who can't get laid, ex-felons and Jodie Foster from having children. I know you think I am jumping to extreme conclusions but the litmus test is all spelled out in the legislation.

The procedures this new legislation would cover are as follows:

"Assisted reproduction", for purposes of IC 31-20, means a method of causing pregnancy other than sexual intercourse. The term includes:
(1) intrauterine insemination;
(2) donation of an egg;
(3) donation of an embryo;
(4) in vitro fertilization and transfer of an embryo; and(5) intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

"Sexual intercourse", for purposes of IC 31-20, means an act that includes any penetration of the female sex organ by the male sex organ"

Who qualifies for these procedures?

(b) The intended parents must be married to each other, and both spousesmust be parties to the action to establish parentage.
(c) An unmarried person may not be an intended parent.

What is the litmus test?

(b) The assessment must follow the normal practice for assessments in a domestic infant adoption procedure and must include the following information:

Personal information about each intended parent, including the following: (I picked the most controversial and subjective, I can understand them not wanting a convicted “child seller” or molester to have kids):
-A description of the family lifestyle of the intended parents include a description of individual participation in faith-based or church activities, hobbies, and other interests.
-The intended parents' child rearing expectations and values.

What are values? Do they mean Republican values? Who are the value police that decide which values they want to be passed down? And if the state is asking the question about people's values and the participation in church or "faith-based" activities that must mean that they are looking for particular answers; otherwise, why ask? If that is the case doesn't that violate a separation of church and state, not to mention a thousand other privacy issues? As with the value police, who decides which church and faith based activities are and are not acceptable? Would that be Patricia Miller, a conservative Methodist Republican?

Don't get me wrong, I am all for making people take tests in order to be qualified to have children, but all people, no matter how the child would physically be created. Well off, educated, committed lesbians who desperately seek a child are not the people we need to be screening and singling out. The people who need to be subject to this test are the 17 year old, High School drop out, trailer trash meth-heads who got knocked up by their home made tattoo, pencil moustache sporting, jobless, whigger boy friend who is in prison and crack head welfare moms who already have 5 fatherless kids that the government supports. Remember, 50% of all heterosexual marriages end in divorce, 20% of all US children live in poverty, and approximately 1500 children die in this country every year due to child abuse in the home. Are those the "values" they prefer children to grow up with? Why don't you look up the number of all the "unwanted" children in same-sex households who get abused and indoctrinated with the gay agenda and see how bad their lives are compared to the kids I just mentioned. What this bill says to me is that they don't care about all the random assholes with a dick that are qualified to procreate as long as they have some skank to stick it in and they can conceive naturally. God forbid someone who actually wants and can support a child of their own try to pursue what is a right of the general dumb ass public.

One final question for the geniuses who drafted this piece of shit: what happens if the approved couple gets a divorce because the mother decided to become a lesbian? Do you make them give the child back? It would make all of this a big waste of time wouldn’t it?

The America hater I am referring to:
Image hosted by
Sponsor: Sen. Patricia Miller (R) (317)232-9489

Go tell her what you think when they discuss this issue on October 20th, 10am in the House Chamber of the State House at 200 W. Washington Street in Indianapolis.

Here is a copy of the legislation:

Update 10/7:

Amongst a storm of criticism and outrage they have withdrawn this ridiculous proposal, for now. Miller did say that she will consider introducing it again in January. So, you probably don't need to attend that meeting on October 20th.

Thanks to Indy Girl for pointing out this follow up article:


indygirl said...

I need to get the fuck out of here.

Toad734 said...

No you don't; as long as you are a Christian Republican.

Karenpuppy said...

Just curious--how much of a chance to pass does this thing really have?

Toad734 said...

I would say 0 Chance; but I believe this is the same lady who came out against stem-cell research as well so who knows. These things always sound ridiculous to normal people but you never know.

Now if it was put into law and then challenged; it would be overturned in a minute.

indygirl said...

Don't you EVER call me a Christian Republican again, Toad. Take it back!

Toad734 said...

I didn't I just said that everything would be ok if you became one.

indygirl said...

Whew! Just checking. My reputation was on the line.

BRUISER said...

That is by far one of the funniest pictures reproduced I have ever seen. You should send it to the Democratic and Republican camps in Indiana just to see who responds the quickest. Just a hunch but I bet the Republicans do a James Guckert/ Jeff Gannon and she is never heard from again...except by those assinine folks from the far right who are currently protesting the soldiers funerals in WI and with this the NEOCON artists agenda is being played out in America 1932...

NewsBlog 5000 said...

So lesbians can't have snowflake babies? Why does this woman hate life so much.

I think this is a conspiracy to get lesbians to pick up guys in bars. The only question is why?

indygirl said...

Thankfully, everyone else has kept their senses.

B said...

We dont use litmus tests in this country.

Two Minutes J said...

"UPDATE". Haha. What is this, Fucking "Unsolved Mysteries" now?

NewsBlog 5000 said...

The only reason we don't have litmus tests is because science education has become so weak.

G_in_AL said...

toad, just thought I would let you know, you put your site address in wrong on my site for your name.

Btw, sorry for your misfortune here. I'm sure, in her mind, this chica was proposing some solid legislation to ensure that children wouldnt be born into "unsuitable" families....

She just kind of forgot that everyone doesnt agree with what her version of "suitable" is.

Boiled Owl said...

On another blog a guy asked me if I would support the Virgin mary's right to have an abortion.

I told him yes, she should have that choice, and that I doubt whether she chose to carry Jesus to term because abortions were illegal in Nazareth.

Then I asked him if he would support two lesbians who wanted to have a kid getting a sperm donation from a homosexual man.

He hasn't responded yet. So it goes.

Boiled Owl said...


Solid legislation to ensure that children are born into suitable circumstances is an impossible dream, as I'm sure you know.

As they say, "the road to hell is paved with good intentions."

That's what's so ironic about the Radical Religious Right. They think they are doing God's work and have no idea how much harm they are causing.

Jack Mercer said...

Hey Toad!

Took a nose-dive healthwise, but am bouncing back. See I have a LOT to catch up on.

Ill be back!


Boiled Owl said...

Toad, I could have sworn that you had another topic up above this one. Did you take it down, or what?