A Jack Cafferty Repost

I never really thought of John McCain as a stupid man. I always saw him as a beacon of hope in the Republican Party until he flip flopped on his religion, his views on torture, abortion, etc. Still, I never thought of him as being intellectually shallow until I watched the pandering session that was held at the Saddleback Church the other night. Then, today I read the commentary by Jack Cafferty on CNN and he had the same reaction as I had and I don't think I could have summed it up any better, which is probably why he gets paid to write his thoughts and I write mine on my lunch break.

Any way, here it is:

NEW YORK (CNN) 8/19/2008 -- Russia invades Georgia and President Bush goes on vacation. Our president has spent one-third of his entire two terms in office either at Camp David, Maryland, or at Crawford, Texas, on vacation.

His time away from the Oval Office included the month leading up to 9/11, when there were signs Osama bin Laden was planning to attack America, and the time Hurricane Katrina destroyed the city of New Orleans.

Sen. John McCain takes weekends off and limits his campaign events to one a day. He made an exception for the religious forum on Saturday at Saddleback Church in Southern California.

I think he made a big mistake. When he was invited last spring to attend a discussion of the role of faith in his life with Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, at Messiah College in Pennsylvania, McCain didn't bother to show up. Now I know why.

It occurs to me that John McCain is as intellectually shallow as our current president. When asked what his Christian faith means to him, his answer was a one-liner. "It means I'm saved and forgiven." Great scholars have wrestled with the meaning of faith for centuries. McCain then retold a story we've all heard a hundred times about a guard in Vietnam drawing a cross in the sand.

Asked about his greatest moral failure, he cited his first marriage, which ended in divorce. While saying it was his greatest moral failing, he offered nothing in the way of explanation. Why not?

Throughout the evening, McCain chose to recite portions of his stump speech as answers to the questions he was being asked. Why? He has lived 71 years. Surely he has some thoughts on what it all means that go beyond canned answers culled from the same speech he delivers every day.

He was asked "if evil exists." His response was to repeat for the umpteenth time that Osama bin Laden is a bad man and he will pursue him to "the gates of hell." That was it.

He was asked to define rich. After trying to dodge the question -- his wife is worth a reported $100 million -- he finally said he thought an income of $5 million was rich.

One after another, McCain's answers were shallow, simplistic, and trite. He showed the same intellectual curiosity that George Bush has -- virtually none.

Where are John McCain's writings exploring the vexing moral issues of our time? Where are his position papers setting forth his careful consideration of foreign policy, the welfare state, education, America's moral responsibility in the world, etc., etc., etc.?

John McCain graduated 894th in a class of 899 at the Naval Academy at Annapolis. His father and grandfather were four star admirals in the Navy. Some have suggested that might have played a role in McCain being admitted. His academic record was awful. And it shows over and over again whenever McCain is called upon to think on his feet.

He no longer allows reporters unfettered access to him aboard the "Straight Talk Express" for a reason. He simply makes too many mistakes. Unless he's reciting talking points or reading from notes or a TelePrompTer, John McCain is lost. He can drop bon mots at a bowling alley or diner -- short glib responses that get a chuckle, but beyond that McCain gets in over his head very quickly.

I am sick and tired of the president of the United States embarrassing me. The world we live in is too complex to entrust it to someone else whose idea of intellectual curiosity and grasp of foreign policy issues is to tell us he can look into Vladimir Putin's eyes and see into his soul.

George Bush's record as a student, military man, businessman and leader of the free world is one of constant failure. And the part that troubles me most is he seems content with himself.

He will leave office with the country $10 trillion in debt, fighting two wars, our international reputation in shambles, our government cloaked in secrecy and suspicion that his entire presidency has been a litany of broken laws and promises, our citizens' faith in our own country ripped to shreds. Yet Bush goes bumbling along, grinning and spewing moronic one-liners, as though nobody understands what a colossal failure he has been.

I fear to the depth of my being that John McCain is just like him.

894th of 899? Compare that to someone with no political connections or millionaire wife, who became the first black President of the Harvard Law Review. Who would you rather have in the drivers seat?

Just because you got shot down over Vietnam doesn't mean you are qualified to be President.

New Terrorists Attacks Would Mean We Are Less Safe

Adviser sorry he said terror attack would help McCain

Ok, so he is sorry that he is an idiot but here's what I don't get: McCain has supported Iraq from day one. Iraq has diverted our military from Afghanistan allowing the most dangerous terrorist leader and organizer of all time to get away. By Bin Laden getting away, this means we are at a greater risk of getting attacked again. By us simply being in Iraq in the first place has been one of the biggest recruitment tools for these terrorist groups and terrorist activity has been at a world wide all time high since Bush has come into office. Bush incites terrorism, he doesn't defeat it.

What I am saying is that if we get hit hard again like we did on 9/11 under Republican protection yet again, doesn't that mean they are doing it wrong? Doesn't that mean they ignored too many security briefings titled, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the US"? Wouldn't a new attack mean we are less safe with the Bush / McCain policies? I mean sure, they will somehow blame this new attack on Bill Clinton or tell us we didn't fork over enough of our civil liberties and that is why it happened but we know that's about as much bullshit as the price of gas being high only because we aren't drilling in ANWR, not because we elected an ex oil man from Texas with ties to the Saudi Royal Family as President.

A vote for McCain is a vote for 100 more years in Iraq and taking our eye off the Bin Laden ball and doing things which inspire people to join the side of the terrorists.

I also fail to see how a guy who lived in Indonesia, whose father was Kenyan and was on US Senate Foreign Relations Committee with Richard Lugar, has less foreign relations experience than what a governor of Texas would have? I guess he isn't running against Bush and is actually running against a guy who was born in Panama so maybe Obama doesn't have the edge there. But wait, isn't it a law that Presidents have been born in the United States?