tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post6143659316476254593..comments2024-01-13T08:02:30.520-06:00Comments on THE TOAD REPORT: Facts About Obama Spending and DebtToad734http://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comBlogger55125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-42479833052922994262011-06-12T00:03:11.315-05:002011-06-12T00:03:11.315-05:00Good fight? I do suppose you can call it that if y...Good fight? I do suppose you can call it that if you have the same views... He's not a good fighter, but rather a good complainer that looks at only the positives from the left and negatives from the right. But I can picture someone talking about cup-a-soup judging something with Chinese food. Harold Camping is going to be wrong, because we'll probably get killed by an asteroid way into the future instead. "God is not real" is your personal opinion. But it's your 1st amendment right to say so, so say it loud and proud Mr. Cup-a-Soup!•rolling eyes•noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-21137533807991545762011-05-30T23:18:59.889-05:002011-05-30T23:18:59.889-05:00wow...I actually took the time to read all, err, m...wow...I actually took the time to read all, err, most of this blog while I was waiting for my cup-a-soup to cool off, and I have to say, Toad, you are completely owning and owning and owning Anonymous - your arguments are more succinct, on point and relevant. although you do have the "high ground" in this one, because, well, the bible is a work of fiction. btw, Anon, from what I remember from sunday school the bible is NOT a chinese menu that you can PICK AND CHOOSE which parts you want...to follow, not order lol<br />anyhow, keep up the good fight.<br />ps/ you know why Harold Camping was wrong about the Rapture coming?....because god is not real.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13241642243572657430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-19731823119066918482011-05-25T09:14:02.688-05:002011-05-25T09:14:02.688-05:00And by the way, Unions didn't really start to ...And by the way, Unions didn't really start to take off until after WW2, not in the 1800s...I mean, there were still slaves in the 1800s.Toad734https://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-36586142168289552022011-05-25T00:23:51.085-05:002011-05-25T00:23:51.085-05:00Trivial jobs that force jobs over seas?? You must ...Trivial jobs that force jobs over seas?? You must be talking about CEOs who make 15x what their Japanese counterparts make...Clearly not someone who actually makes cars and makes $20 per hour. It's the CEOs who want to make $20 million per year which drives jobs over seas...If unions drove jobs overseas then the auto industry jobs would have been the first to go and the textile jobs would have been the last to go...But we saw just the opposite didn't we...Ever buy a piece of clothing made in the US in the last 10 years? What about a pair of shoes in the last 15 years?? Yet, my car, which is 5 years old, was made in America with union labor. Get your story straight before you talk shit...It makes you look stupid.<br /><br />No one has ever been forced to join a union...Ever...Just like Obama was born in the US and there were no WMDs and the US actually DID land on the moon...Get a life. Conspiracy theories are fun but if you are looking for real conspiracy theories stick with the bible...Not Faux News talking points.Toad734https://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-55919481340601344982011-05-24T20:38:34.344-05:002011-05-24T20:38:34.344-05:00Toad, you are absolutely right that unions are a g...Toad, you are absolutely right that unions are a great thing for this country... If you're talking about the 1800s of course. Unions have people protest against companies to increase wages, even though a lot of jobs are trivial to do. So then what happens? Jobs from this country are being brought to other countries like China. Dmarks is bringing an excellent point here, they basically DO force people to join, like loan officers and people receiving unemployment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-17111446344127612452011-05-13T13:51:39.110-05:002011-05-13T13:51:39.110-05:00No one is forced against their will to join a unio...No one is forced against their will to join a union. They can simply take the job at the factory that's hiring so many workers across the street right?<br /><br />cough - bullshit-coughToad734https://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-3135885137215389372011-05-13T13:50:25.494-05:002011-05-13T13:50:25.494-05:00Show me just one mainstream media article where th...Show me just one mainstream media article where the Bush administration claimed they found WMDs in Iraq...Just one...Bet you can't. But that's probably just the liberal media covering it up so they can push their homosexual agenda on everyone right?? Oh wait, you have a conservative media outlet in Faux News...They have a huge hard on for Bush so surely they have reported on the massive amounts of WMDs found in Iraq. <br /><br />You + Credibility = 0Toad734https://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-62751059212785021522011-05-13T13:37:26.917-05:002011-05-13T13:37:26.917-05:00".... you bust up unions and trade in your on...".... you bust up unions and trade in your once full time job to be a part time greeter at Walmart...You are being lied to and they are laughing at you."<br /><br />More corrections needed:<br /><br />There are NO republican plans to bust up unions. However, there ARE plans to ensure that whether or not to join a union is the choice of individual workers.<br /><br />Democrats believe that unions can only survive if workers are forced into them against their will. This shows both great comtempt for workers rights, and some sort of belief on the Democrats' part that unions are so unpopular with workers that no worker would ever choose to join on their own.<br /><br />This would ONLY eliminate unions if they are all so bad that no one would join any except forced. Do you think unions are this bad?<br /><br />Also, remember, America works best when it says Union NO. <br /><br />I live in a town where there are two factories across the street. One is union-free, thanks to a concerted effort by the workers to keep the thugs out. This plant keeps hiring more and more workers.<br /><br />The other is a plant where workers are forced to join the UAW. Or was. The union forced the plant to close. The situation with the low-quality product (from the union preventing bad workers from being fired) and the company being prevented from paying a fair wage was just not sustainable.<br /><br />And yes, we are being lied to. That is an excellent and summary of your statements.<br /><br />Try telling the truth sometimes.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-52238338581636909972011-05-13T13:31:44.911-05:002011-05-13T13:31:44.911-05:00". Republicans aren't the only ones that ...". Republicans aren't the only ones that believed Saddam has WMDs. "<br /><br />Saddam did in fact have WMD. Several were found after the allies invaded the country.<br /><br />These were not WMD, but were old ones from the Gulf War that fully met the definition of WMD.<br /><br />"Saddam had no WMD" is one of the biggest lies involving the Iraq war.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-80743143615873442011-04-24T16:19:37.639-05:002011-04-24T16:19:37.639-05:00HAPPY EASTER DUDE!!!:-)HAPPY EASTER DUDE!!!:-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-82979440126872334582011-04-23T16:17:29.369-05:002011-04-23T16:17:29.369-05:00"Together we must also confront the new hazar..."Together we must also confront the new hazards of nuclear and biological weapons, and the outlaws of states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to aquire them. Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons to deliver them." President Clinton, Jan. 27, 1998. Republicans aren't the only ones that believed Saddam has WMDs. Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, Al Gore and other Democrats. And Christianity has more number of followers than any other belief. The rest I didn't quite catch, because all I heard was TURD THOUGHTS! )XDAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-78322635040963392812011-04-18T09:51:04.577-05:002011-04-18T09:51:04.577-05:00...Aside from an extra $800 Billion in debt of cou......Aside from an extra $800 Billion in debt of course.Toad734https://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-48711614494305235292011-04-17T15:46:01.438-05:002011-04-17T15:46:01.438-05:00Only 33% of the planet worships Jesus so who is ou...Only 33% of the planet worships Jesus so who is outnumbered?<br /><br />Less developed conscious?? Actually, most of the 10 Commandments came from Hammurabi's code of laws and that same code of laws were way more extensive than the Jewish laws of Moses and were written 300 years before the 10 commandments. And now only 3 of the 10 commandments(the ones that were in Hammurabie code) are a part of most Western societies laws and legal system. Hammurabi had banking laws and everything. Far more evolved than the 10 commandments.<br /><br />And just because more people believe something doesn't make it true...You all believed Iraq had WMDs but where did that belief get you?Toad734https://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-16659414864526494652011-04-17T15:32:54.514-05:002011-04-17T15:32:54.514-05:00Your belief is outnumbered. Enough of your turd th...Your belief is outnumbered. Enough of your turd thoughts! )XDAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-65351985443223046542011-04-17T15:30:02.115-05:002011-04-17T15:30:02.115-05:00What I mean by "less primitive" is a les...What I mean by "less primitive" is a less developed conscience. You persist on talking about the old testament and comparing god like a tooth fairy. I don't believe in most of genesis and exodus. Only the slightest information could be described metaphorically. Ok, lets be fair. Whichever has the highest amount of believers today are most likely true. Atheism vs. Christianity? Hmmm... HMMM...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-26163546145517227862011-04-16T15:40:47.015-05:002011-04-16T15:40:47.015-05:00I totally agree that there is no proof that god do...I totally agree that there is no proof that god doesn't exist but again, I would still say there is also no proof that the tooth fairy doesn't exist either even though I actually have seen evidence of her existence but no evidence of god.<br /><br />Less primitive?? The Sumerians? Egyptians?? Sumerians invented writing, studied the stars, invented agriculture,etc. I don't think that could be counted as primitive...No more primitive than Noah.<br /><br />If the lord could have always existed why couldn't a clump of exploding mass?? Again, if one is possible then the other is possible...Especially if the other one is far less complex and perfect and "evolved". <br /><br />So if you don't believe most of the old testament, why do you believe one of the most ridiculous components of the Old Testament, the one that says the Earth was created by god in 6 days, 10k years ago and that an all perfect being has always just existed some how??I think I would be more inclined to believe the Exodus story and the golden calf and the Ark than I would theoretic beginnings of the Universe...Speaking of primitive, doesn't it just make sense that bronze age tribesmen had no other way to explain where the Sun went at night or what caused locust infestations and volcanic eruptions so they made up a story about a god doing these things to or for people?<br /><br /><br />But no, there is no proof that god doesn't exist but plenty of evidence that, as you say, most of the Bible is not accurate. And with that, I don't know how you pick and chose ho to believe any of it...Not that I don't think there is any historical facts contained in it, as there is, but there are probably SOME facts in The Enquirer and possibly even the Glenn Beck show but that doesn't make them a credible source.Toad734https://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-11268080590133730322011-04-16T14:07:18.933-05:002011-04-16T14:07:18.933-05:00What I meant earlier about the big bang is that wh...What I meant earlier about the big bang is that when that event happened, something must have existed before that, instead of nothing. That something would be the Lord, who has always existed in my belief. My opinion why he waited to reveal himself to those guys is that they had a good enough conscience to do so. I don't believe in a lot of the old testament stuff anyways. And I believe that the Lord waited for people to have a less primitive mind. But I believe that he guided people through morals to wait for the right moment to reveal himself. Where is he right now? My theory is that he's in heaven, guiding people through morals, or both. I believe in evolution as well. You persist on making bible references. It's about believing in God in general, really. There's no full-on proof that God exists. There's no proof that he doesn't either. Agree to disagree.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-83829404267997038962011-04-16T12:24:15.813-05:002011-04-16T12:24:15.813-05:00Something coming from nothing actually disproves y...Something coming from nothing actually disproves your god, not the big bang. The story of the universe coming into existence and evolution most certainly states that it all came from something, something more primitive. It's god who supposedly spontaneously appeared out of nothing as an all perfect, all knowing, all powerful being.<br /><br />And since we know "something can't come from nothing" isn't true, because we are here and the two most popular theories on how that happened is the Big Bang and god...So we know for sure that statement of something can't come from nothing is false because here we are...I mean, again, it's not that I saw we came from nothing but no, I can't explain where that original clump of mass came from...It was probably the left over matter from a previous universe that collapsed on itself and then became so dense it exploded but still, by not having an origin of that material, I am in the same boat as you not having an origin for your far more complex life form that would have, by your logic, had to have a creator and came from something.<br /><br />So which is more likely?<br />A. A clump of mass came from nothing<br />or<br />B. An all perfect, all knowing, powerful, complex being came from nothing.<br /><br />Do we see that a lot in nature? Do new species of birds just spontaneously appear into existence as full functioning beings or do they, along with all other life forms on this planets,clearly show an evolutionary path coming from older, more primitive species?<br /><br />And if your god was here all along, why is he absent from any Sumerian and early Egyptian religions? They all had older gods that came before yours...Why did he wait a thousand years before revealing himself to Abraham and Noah and those guys? Where was he before that? Where is he now?Toad734https://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-36969582805772088712011-04-16T12:24:15.453-05:002011-04-16T12:24:15.453-05:00Something coming from nothing actually disproves y...Something coming from nothing actually disproves your god, not the big bang. The story of the universe coming into existence and evolution most certainly states that it all came from something, something more primitive. It's god who supposedly spontaneously appeared out of nothing as an all perfect, all knowing, all powerful being.<br /><br />And since we know "something can't come from nothing" isn't true, because we are here and the two most popular theories on how that happened is the Big Bang and god...So we know for sure that statement of something can't come from nothing is false because here we are...I mean, again, it's not that I saw we came from nothing but no, I can't explain where that original clump of mass came from...It was probably the left over matter from a previous universe that collapsed on itself and then became so dense it exploded but still, by not having an origin of that material, I am in the same boat as you not having an origin for your far more complex life form that would have, by your logic, had to have a creator and came from something.<br /><br />So which is more likely?<br />A. A clump of mass came from nothing<br />or<br />B. An all perfect, all knowing, powerful, complex being came from nothing.<br /><br />Do we see that a lot in nature? Do new species of birds just spontaneously appear into existence as full functioning beings or do they, along with all other life forms on this planets,clearly show an evolutionary path coming from older, more primitive species?<br /><br />And if your god was here all along, why is he absent from any Sumerian and early Egyptian religions? They all had older gods that came before yours...Why did he wait a thousand years before revealing himself to Abraham and Noah and those guys? Where was he before that? Where is he now?Toad734https://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-17158995213017115912011-04-16T10:52:38.341-05:002011-04-16T10:52:38.341-05:00Well... Because he's God. He just decided to m...Well... Because he's God. He just decided to make this universe this way, which I would imagine would take either a lot of planning or no planning at all. He just did it. You're theory is the big bang, which I believe as well. But there is a problem with that. Something cannot come from nothing. It just doesn't work that way. The existence of us is a highly underrated phenomenon. You didn't answer my previous question there, sport.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-53230603455629266912011-04-15T23:05:48.554-05:002011-04-15T23:05:48.554-05:00is there away you can explain to me how god starte...is there away you can explain to me how god started from nothing to a tiny point of light to an extremely large universe?Toad734https://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-19110722830712294152011-04-15T16:55:07.576-05:002011-04-15T16:55:07.576-05:00You persist on talking about the bible. I've a...You persist on talking about the bible. I've already disscussed to you about the bible, but I suppose I could be more in depth. The writers of the bible are based on the visions they had. A lot of them are false in the old testament, probably because people were a lot worse 3-4 thousand years ago, while in the new testament, ranging sometime in the 1st century. Mainly, for me, it's just about the belief in God and Jesus Christ sacrificed himself for our sins. So, since you don't believe in God, is there away you can explain to me how the universe started from nothing to a tiny point of light to an extremely large universe? I'll wait for awhile for an answer, since it will probably take time for you to come up with an answer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-11140142803615897442011-04-13T08:36:07.093-05:002011-04-13T08:36:07.093-05:00Again, something has to exist in order to be bad. ...Again, something has to exist in order to be bad. I am just saying the god written about in the Old Testament is a pretty humanesque figure with temper tantrums and jealousy issues and anything but graceful...Assuming he is real anyway...And if this is the same guy that's in the New Testament....Toad734https://www.blogger.com/profile/01450263690181812924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-30593062022356368112011-04-13T00:09:04.203-05:002011-04-13T00:09:04.203-05:00Anything else you want to say about believing in T...Anything else you want to say about believing in The Lord being bad, I'll answer it. You probably won't like the answer, but I can give one. Otherwise, may the grace of the Lord be with you. Amen.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9410473.post-51806031646439196272011-04-09T14:58:01.150-05:002011-04-09T14:58:01.150-05:00Because I believe in the main points of Christiani...Because I believe in the main points of Christianity: God created the heavens and the earth, and he send his son Jesus to earth to be crucified and forgive us for our sins. And the message of love your neighbor as you love yourself and be a good person. I probably believe in about half of the bible, if not less. You don't have to believe that EVERY single scripture is true to be considered a Christian.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com